WPOven vs Kinsta
WPOven is a better yet affordable Kinsta alternative . Given below are a few reasons which may help make up your mind …
Kinsta’s visit based pricing is simply too restrictive and can easily cause overages as hits being counted for bots, crawlers and even people hotlinking in.
From our experience most people have on average 3 – 5 sites , which would require a Bui8sness plan on Kinsta even if those sites have little to no traffic. While on WPOven you may start with the smallest plan and grow as you need and add as many sites the server can handle.
One can never have enough storage, for the same value plans WPOven offer storage which is in factors of magnitude being offered by Kinsta. Buisness 1 plan ($100) from Kinsta comes with 10 GB storage which we think is simply too less, while a similar plan from WPOven charged at $79.95 comes with 80GB SSD storage.
Given below are the excerpts from a comprehensive hosting performance test done by Review Signal.
500-3000 Concurrent Users over 30 Minutes, 10 Minutes at Peak
|Requests / Sec (at Peak load)||342.95||332.65|
|Average Requests / Sec||243.75||236.44|
|Response Time at peak load (ms)||10,051||10,017|
|Average Response Time (ms)||370||377|
Kinsta, and WPOven handled this test without issue. Kinsta had 1 error between both load tests
WPOven handled this test without issue. Good uptime, 1 cumulative error on the load tests. Great job. Another repeat Top Tier performance from WPOven
Annual Cost Comparison
To put things into perspective we have done a small cost analysis of owning a 3 Sites on WPOven and Kinsta with CDN and SSL on them.We assume the sites in total receive about 100K visitors per month.We have given costs of both the Hobby and a Personal plan as both can handle such traffic and sites but depends on number of plugins and the type of site as well.